Saddleback Debates

Since the recent Presidential debates in Saddleback church were mainly about character and less about the candidates, relationship with God, it is difficult to comprehend liberals' Linda Blair-like reaction.

What I do find interesting is that when the topic of religious influences came up, Obama conveniently neglected to mention Reverend Wright, his mentor and leader of the church of segregation. A church where Obama spent nearly half of his life had his children baptized and got married.

Liberals’ assertion that intellectual capacity is the supreme measure of a leader could not be more wrong. While McCain had clear, concise, and decisive answers which made him the clear winner of the debate, Obama’s intellectual attempt to straddle both sides of each question made him look like an appeasing politician trying to please both sides.

I find it hilarious that since John McCain knows who he is, what he stands for, and was therefore able to answer the questions instantly and that Obama hemmed and hawed his way through the whole debate, liberals could only surmise that McCain must have cheated.

What level of bitterness leads a human being to think of a child saying grace aloud in a public school lunchroom as a cause for litigation? Do liberals really feel that any reference to God suffered by their children is mental contamination and thus grounds for a lawsuit?

Ironically, the ACLU and their fanatic cronies are every bit as zealous trying to obliterate God from society as Tomas de Torquemada was in trying to purify the people of Europe during the Spanish Inquisition.

Why Obama Really Snubbed Our Injured Troops

Since Obama was so worried about people thinking that visiting our wounded soldiers would be viewed as a political tactic, he chose not to go. Therefore, it is fair to say that Obama is more worried about public perception than doing what is right. Talk about courage.

If I voted against funding those who were severely wounded protecting my safety and I had no concern for the success of their mission, I, like Obama, would not be able to look them in the eye and would refuse to visit.

The good news is there just may be a hint of conscience in our would-be messiah.

Contrary to public sentiment, one cannot support the troops and not support their mission. That’s like saying “I love construction workers and contractors but I wish there were no houses and buildings.” Our troops are smarter than that.

McCain vs Hussein (Obama)

Although I do not agree with John McCain on every issue, I whole heartedly believe he is a man of great character and integrity and towers over Obama in the areas of trustworthiness, judgment and experience. While McCain presents the persona of an elder statesman and hero, Obama reminds me of a spoiled mendacious child conniving, hiding, and avoiding the facts to get his way.

Whenever controversy arises for the Obama campaign, he calls it a distraction and says “we need to move on”. Well, yes of course he needs to move on before the curtain is lifted and the wizard’s true colors become evident.

If Obama can be mentored and preached to by a man for twenty years and not share, or at the very least know, his opinions and feelings about our great country, can we believe he is telling the truth? If he is telling the truth can we trust his judgment? I will answer for you – NO.

Obama is a man who does not have the time to go on the O’Reilly factor, the most watched cable news show in the country, yet he seems to have ample time to pencil in Ellen, The View, American Idol, Saturday Night Live, and Jon Stewart to name just a few. He calls himself a Uniter [sic] but excludes millions of potential voters and tough questions by hiding out in friendly liberal venues.

John McCain does not need to claim a “misspeak”, embellish his resume, or feign ignorance. His record stands for itself and I look forward to watching him take the child who posed his way to the democratic nomination to task in the upcoming general election.